© 2025 KGOU
News and Music for Oklahoma
Play Live Radio
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
0:00 0:00
Available On Air Stations

Potential NOAA cuts are already giving one Oklahoma lawmaker ‘stomach cramps’

Congressman Frank Lucas speaks to visitors during a town hall meeting in Sapulpa, Okla., on February 22, 2017.
Tulsa World Archive
Congressman Frank Lucas speaks to visitors during a town hall meeting in Sapulpa, Okla., on February 22, 2017.

Rep. Frank Lucas wasn’t familiar with proposed cuts to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s budget. But the very idea of it, given Oklahoma’s heavy reliance on its data because of its location in the heart of Tornado Alley, was already physically hurting him.

“The very discussion about reducing our investment in our scientific research and our weather forecasting causes me to have stomach cramps,” Lucas, a Republican, said.

Multiple outlets reported that the Office of Management and Budget is considering cuts to NOAA that would effectively eliminate its research arm and slash its budget by $1.3 billion. OMB and NOAA did not respond to a request for comment about the cuts, including questions about how they could affect Oklahoma facilities.

But Lucas said he hopes future funding of NOAA will be “rational and practical” and “not a step back from progress we’ve made” in weather forecasting.

“We’ll cross that bridge when we get there, but thank goodness I have the chairman of the Appropriations Committee,” Lucas added, referring to Republican Rep. Tom Cole, also a member of the Oklahoma delegation.

Cole previously stepped in to oppose the termination of several federal facilities in his district, including the National Weather Center in Norman, Oklahoma. Cole said in March that he successfully negotiated with the Trump administration to keep the center, an atmospheric research and weather forecast center that trains meteorologists on the University of Oklahoma’s campus, safe from cuts by the Department of Government Efficiency.

As for the proposed budget cuts to NOAA, Cole said he had not talked with OMB about them and that he had only seen what was included in the administration’s budget wishlist.

“We just can’t be more definitive right now,” Cole said when asked if Oklahoma could handle cuts to NOAA. His office did not respond to follow-up questions about whether he was planning to negotiate with OMB and advocate for Oklahoma’s NOAA facilities amid proposed budget cuts.

The second Trump administration has already rattled NOAA as part of its efforts to trim the size of government through DOGE — hundreds of probationary employees were laid off at NOAA in February, including some in Oklahoma, according to KGOU.

And after the Trump administration letcontracts at the Regional Climate Centers, which analyze and share weather and air quality data,expire in April, weather data centers under NOAA were forced to stop operating. They were booted back up again a few days later.

While changes at NOAA would have an outsized effect on Oklahoma, which saw a record-breaking 152 tornadoes in 2024, members of its delegation are not the only Republicans signaling they’d be opposed to certain cuts.

Lawmakers from Louisiana, in the nation’s most hurricane-prone region, told NOTUS earlier this year that cuts to NOAA and its budget would be a mistake. Republican Rep. Clay Higgins said he was prepared to protect NOAA’s “core purpose.”

Five former leaders of the National Weather Service, a forecasting agency under NOAA that provides weather alerts, are also warning that the proposed cuts could have dire consequences.

“Our worst nightmare is that weather forecast offices will be so understaffed that there will be needless loss of life,” they said in a joint letter on May 2. “We know that’s a nightmare shared by those on the forecasting front lines — and by the people who depend on their efforts.”

Oklahoma Sen. James Lankford also said he had not seen the proposed NOAA cuts.

“There are going to be very few government agencies, if any, that don’t have areas that they could be leaner,” Lankford said. “To just say that there’s cuts, that’s not a problem.”

Depending on the program or grant, Lankford added, cuts could be “actually beneficial,” though he said he’d have to see what these cuts were before determining that.

This story was produced as part of a partnership between NOTUS, a publication of the nonprofit, nonpartisan Allbritton Journalism Institute, and Oklahoma Watch.


Oklahoma Watch, at oklahomawatch.org, is a nonprofit, nonpartisan news organization that covers public-policy issues facing the state.

Em Luetkemeyer is a NOTUS reporter covering the federal government for Oklahoma Watch.
Oklahoma Watch is a non-profit organization that produces in-depth and investigative journalism on important public-policy issues facing the state. Oklahoma Watch is non-partisan and strives to be balanced, fair, accurate and comprehensive. The reporting project collaborates on occasion with other news outlets. Topics of particular interest include poverty, education, health care, the young and the old, and the disadvantaged.
More News
Support nonprofit, public service journalism you trust. Give now.